4.7 Article

Strangles: Taking steps towards eradication

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 167, 期 1-2, 页码 50-60

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.03.033

关键词

Strangles; Streptococcus equi; ELISA; qPCR; Vaccine

资金

  1. Animal Health Trust
  2. Horse Trust
  3. Horserace Betting Levy Board
  4. British Horse Society
  5. Wellcome Trust
  6. European Breeders Fund
  7. Anne Duchess of Westminster's Charitable Trust
  8. PetPlan Charitable Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strangles, caused by the host adapted Lancefield group C bacterium Streptococcus equi subspecies equi (S. equi), is one of the oldest recognised infectious diseases of horses and continues to cause significant welfare and economic cost throughout the world. The ability of S. equi to establish sub-clinical persistent infections primarily in the guttural pouches of convalescent horses has been instrumental to its success. However, the implementation of simple control measures that permit the identification and treatment of persistently infected carriers can prevent further outbreaks of disease at a local level. This review summarises some of the molecular mechanisms exploited by S. equi to cause disease. New qPCR and iELISA diagnostic tests replace culture methodologies as the gold standard for the detection of infected animals. A strategy to maximise the effective application of these tests to direct management methods for the eradication of S. equi infection is presented and the role of preventative vaccines is discussed. In contrast to current understanding, emerging data illustrates the dynamism of the global S. equi population and potential consequences for the effectiveness of currently available vaccines. The ability to use modem vaccines alongside conventional biosecurity and screening procedures will be critical to the large-scale prevention and even eradication of strangles, providing an opportunity to finally break the stranglehold that this disease has on the world's equine industry. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据