4.7 Article

Real-time PCR culture and serology for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken breeder flocks

期刊

VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY
卷 144, 期 3-4, 页码 319-324

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.01.012

关键词

Mycoplasma gallisepticum; Real-time PCR; Chicken

资金

  1. Uludag University Scientific Research Unit [2006/29]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to compare a real-time PCR (rPCR) test with improved detection limit to serology and culture for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) infection in chicken breeder flocks. Six hundred and forty-six blood and tracheal swab samples belonging to 31 grandparent chicken breeder flocks were tested by rPCR. The detection limit of rPCR was 0.9 pg mu l(-1), with pure MG S6 strain DNA and 100 colony forming units (CFUs) ml(-1), where both pure culture and tracheal swabs were artificially spiked with the same strain. The seropositive flock rate based on both MG RPA and HI were calculated as 48.4% (15/ 31) and 32.3% (10/31), respectively, while culture- and rPCR-positive flock rates were 16.1% (5/31) and 29.0% (9/31), respectively. On flock-based analysis, culture method detected 5 out of 10 MG seropositive flocks (sensitivity 50%, specificity 100%), whereas rPCR detected 8 out of 10 flocks (sensitivity 80%, specificity 95%). Agreements between serology and culture, and serology and rPCR were 83.9% and 90.3%, respectively. On individual sample-based analysis, culture method detected 26 out of 78 MG seropositive chicken (sensitivity 33%, specificity 100%), whereas rPCR detected 51 out of 78 MG seropositive chickens (sensitivity 65%, specificity 96%). There was 91.9% and 91.4% agreement between serology and culture, and serology and rPCR, respectively. Results of this study indicate that the rPCR with improved in vitro detection limit could detect MG in seropositive chicken flocks. Therefore, we advise the use of rPCR and/or culture for confirmation of serology results obtained from screening MG infection in chicken flocks. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据