4.3 Article

Monoclonal antibodies to equine IgM improve the sensitivity of West Nile virus-specific IgM detection in horses

期刊

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 122, 期 1-2, 页码 46-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.10.013

关键词

West Nile virus; horse; IgM; ELISA; monoclonal antibody

向作者/读者索取更多资源

West Nile virus (WNV) is a zoonotic pathogen of global importance. In horses with neurological signs, detection of WNV-specific immunoglobulin M (lam) in serum is widely used to identify clinical cases of WNV encephalitis. Here, we describe the development of two monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to equine lam which were used in a WNV IgM-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Their performance was compared to an established assay based on polyclonal anti-lam. Check test serum samples from the National Veterinary Service Laboratory (NVSL) were used to evaluate the performance of the three anti-IgM antibodies. The anti-IgM 1-22 mAb correctly identified all NVSL samples. Both the polyclonal antibody and monoclonal anti-IgM 2B-63 identified eight out of ten samples correctly. The three assays were then compared using serum samples from clinically healthy animals (n = 33) and horses with neurological signs (n = 2 1). High Spearman rank correlations (0.76-0.86) were found among the ELISA results. Inter-test agreements (weighted kappa) for assay interpretation resulted in strong agreement (0.95) of the results obtained by the mAbs and moderate agreements when monoclonal and polyclonal anti-IgM-based assays were compared. To determine the analytical sensitivities of anti-WNV IgM detection, serial dilutions of WNV IgM-positive serum samples were analyzed. The highest sensitivity was obtained by using the anti-IgM 1-22 mAb to capture lam from equine serum. In conclusion, the use of monoclonal anti-IgM antibodies can improve the sensitivity of lam detection in the acute phase of WN disease. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据