4.3 Article

Determination of the immunotoxic potential of heavy metals on the functional activity of bottlenose dolphin leukocytes in vitro

期刊

VETERINARY IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNOPATHOLOGY
卷 121, 期 3-4, 页码 189-198

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2007.09.009

关键词

immunotoxicity; bottlenose dolphin; heavy metals; viability; apoptosis; lymphoproliferation; phagocytosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heavy metals may affect the immune system of cetaceans. But no information exists on their effects on the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) immune system, although this species is a coastal top predator which can bioaccumulate high concentrations of them. This work studies the effects of Hg (1, 5 and 10 mg/L), Al (2,5, 25 and 50 mg/L), Cd (1, 10, 20 and 40 mg/L), Pb (1, 10, 20 and 50 mg/L) and Cr (I and 10 mg/L), on the function of phagocytes and lymphocytes isolated from the peripheral blood of bottlenose dolphins under in vitro conditions. Cell viability, apoptosis, lymphocyte proliferation and phagocytosis were evaluated. Viability and lympboproliferation were measured with Alamar Blue assay, and apoptosis and phagocytosis were evaluated with flow cytometry. Apoptosis was detected as mechanism of cell death after cadmium and mercury exposure. A significant reduction in the lymphoproliferative response was registered by exposure to I mg/L of mercury, 10 mg/L of cadmium and 50 mg/L of lead. Decreased phagocytosis was also observed at 5 mg/L of mercury, 50 mg/L of aluminium and 10 mg/L of cadmium. Chromium did not present any effects on any immune assay at the concentrations tested. The concentrations of heavy metals that were found to affect the functional activity of bottlenose dolphin leukocytes are within the environmental ranges reported in the tissues of bottlenose dolphins. These results support the hypothesis that exposure to these contaminants, particularly mercury and cadmium could lead to a reduction in host resistance to disease in these animals. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据