4.2 Article

Altered mRNA and protein expression of filaggrin in the skin of a canine animal model for atopic dermatitis

期刊

VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 329-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/vde.12031

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Society of Veterinary Dermatology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background - Filaggrin is a structural protein that has attracted increasing interest over the past decade for its role in the pathogenesis of human atopic dermatitis (AD). Null mutations in its sequence are considered risk factors in the development of AD. Hypothesis/Objectives - To investigate canine filaggrin mRNA and protein expression in the skin of atopic beagles with experimentally induced AD compared with breed-matched healthy control dogs. Methods - All dogs were environmentally challenged for 3 days consecutively with allergens to which the atopic dogs had been sensitized. Skin biopsy specimens were taken from six healthy and seven atopic beagles before and after allergen challenge. Canine filaggrin mRNA was measured using quantitative real-time PCR. Indirect immunofluorescence was used to localize the filaggrin protein in canine skin. Analysis of variance with Tukey's multiple comparison test (over-time effect) and unpaired Student's t-test (treatment effect) were used. Values of P <= 0.05 were considered significant. Results - Analysis of variance showed a significantly higher expression of filaggrin mRNA in atopic dogs compared with healthy control dogs (P = 0.004 on day 3 and P = 0.01 on day 10) and a decreased mRNA expression on day 3 in healthy control dogs (effect of time, P = 0.006). On blinded evaluation, filaggrin immunofluorescence was distributed homogeneously in the stratum granulosum and the stratum corneum in healthy dogs. Atopic dogs showed a patchy immunofluorescence pattern, which was exacerbated after environmental challenge. Conclusions and clinical importance - Altered epidermal filaggrin mRNA expression and protein distribution was detected in this experimental model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据