4.2 Article

Owner assessment of therapeutic interventions for canine atopic dermatitis: a long-term retrospective analysis

期刊

VETERINARY DERMATOLOGY
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 228-+

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01054.x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Dechra Veterinary Products

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Canine atopic dermatitis is a frequent diagnosis in veterinary medicine; however, the long-term prognosis for canine atopic dermatitis has not been evaluated in a systematic fashion. Hypothesis/Objectives To compare the relative efficacy of commonly used therapies for canine atopic dermatitis in two groups of dogs over 5 and 10 year time periods. Animals Dogs were identified from the medical record database of a privately owned veterinary dermatology practice in the USA. Methods Clients completed a four-part, 28-question, Internet-based survey. Surveys were included in the analysis if one entire section was completed. Each question was completed independently of the answers to other questions. Results Several respondents failed to complete all questions. Some respondents answered similar questions with contradictory answers. Each question was analysed individually. A total of 136 owner surveys were completed, 39 from the 10 year and 97 from the 5 year study dogs. Eighty-five of 135 respondents indicated that their pet was receiving some form of medical therapy for atopic dermatitis at the time of the survey. Thirty of 90 respondents (33.3%) indicated that their dog improved during a dietary trial. Five dogs met the studys definition for clinical cure. All five of these dogs had been treated with allergen-specific immunotherapy. Conclusions and clinical importance This study revealed that clients believe antihistamines can be a useful part of multimodal therapy for canine atopic dermatitis. The results also demonstrated that a significant number of canines benefited from dietary modification. In addition, allergen-specific immunotherapy was the only treatment to induce true clinical remission of atopic dermatitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据