4.3 Article

Holocene palaeoenvironment in a former coastal lagoon of the arid south eastern Iberian Peninsula: salinization effects on δ15N

期刊

VEGETATION HISTORY AND ARCHAEOBOTANY
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 667-674

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00334-008-0153-y

关键词

Holocene; Mediterranean; Climate; Salinization; C/N; delta C-13; delta N-15

资金

  1. Spanish Government [REN2003-04871/GLO, CGL2004-01402/BOS]
  2. Catalan Government [SGR 2005-00312]
  3. ALARM [506675]
  4. NUE [017841]
  5. Spanish Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The palaeoenvironment of a former coastal lagoon in the south eastern Iberian Peninsula (San Rafael, Almeria, Spain) were inferred from one core analyzed for particulate organic matter content (POM) together with its C/N, delta C-13, delta N-15 to depict the biogeochemical record from the Late Glacial to the Holocene. The results, complemented by previously reported pollen assemblages, indicate the appearance of a freshwater lagoon at 7300 B.P. (uncalibrated C-14 age), its salinization at 6200 B.P. and its disappearance at 4400 B.P. The period of existence of the lagoon coincided with a period of wetter conditions as inferred from terrestrial vegetation. The lagoon's salinization was not related to a decrease in precipitation but to a stronger maritime influence since there were no parallel changes in terrestrial vegetation. Salinization caused an increase in delta C-13, associated with a higher relative presence of C-4 plants, and an increase in delta N-15, due to a decrease in plant N demand. The late period of the lagoon, from about 5100 to 4400 B.P., shows a progressive drying and salinization not detected in isotopes but reflected in a decrease in POM, and in the pollen records. Increases in delta N-15 were related to increases in salinity within the lagoon, and are indicative of a more open N cycle, because the absence of changes in terrestrial vegetation rules out changes in the catchment area as the cause for changes in delta N-15.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据