4.2 Article

Presence of multiple variants of Borrelia burgdorferi in the natural reservoir Peromyscus leucopus throughout a transmission season

期刊

VECTOR-BORNE AND ZOONOTIC DISEASES
卷 8, 期 3, 页码 397-405

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2007.0222

关键词

Borrelia; Ixodes; Lyme disease

资金

  1. NIEHS NIH HHS [T32ES07141] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [U50/CCU319554] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [T32ES007141] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) serve as the principal reservoir for Borrelia burgdorferi and. have been shown to remain infected for life. Complex infections with multiple genetic variants of B. burgdorferi occur in mice through multiple exposures to infected ticks or through exposure to ticks infected with multiple variants of B. burgdorferi. Using a combination of cloning and single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP), B. burgdorferi ospC variation was assessed in serial samples collected from individual P. leucopus during a single transmission season. In individuals with ospC variation, at least seven ospC variants were recognized at each time point. One to four of these variants predominated at each time point; however, the predominant variants seldom remained consistent in an individual mouse throughout the entire sampling period. These results confirmed that mice in southern Maryland were persistently infected with multiple variants of B. burgdorferi throughout the transmission season. However, the presence of multiple ospC variants and the fluctuations in the frequency of these variants indicates that either new ospC variants are regularly introduced to this mouse population and predominate while the existing infections are cleared, or that the variation detected in the genetic profile at different time points reflects a complex mixture of B. burgdorferi populations whose relative frequencies may continually change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据