4.1 Article

Intra-Arterial Transplantation of Adult Bone Marrow Cells Restores Blood Flow and Regenerates Skeletal Muscle in Ischemic Limbs

期刊

VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 433-443

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1538574409335158

关键词

arteriosclerosis; angiogenesis; ApoE knockout mice; peripheral arterial disease; bone marrow cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Bone marrow cell therapy promotes angiogenesis, but the cellular fate of bone marrow cells (BMCs) in the absence of immunosuppressant interventions is unclear. We created a model of severe hind limb ischemia to address whether BMCs form new blood vessels or differentiate into other tissues. Methods and Results: After ligating the common femoral artery in ApoE knockout mice, we injected either phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or 5 x 10(7) adult unfractionated BMCs obtained from green fluorescent protein-positive mice. Laser Doppler imaging of the ischemic limbs revealed that intra-arterial BMCs significantly increased blood flow recovery in ischemic limbs beginning 21 days after surgery and peaking at 27 days (61.8% +/- 15% vs. 41.9% +/- 13.9%, respectively, for BMCs and PBS, P < .05). The BMCs differentiated into small blood vessels, skeletal myofibers, and supporting membranes, and these changes were associated with increased serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF-2), transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), interleukin 4 (IL-4), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Conclusions: Adult BMCs injected into ischemic limbs without immunosuppressant therapy differentiated into blood vessels and skeletal myofibers, and this was associated with accelerated blood flow restoration and increased serum levels of VEGF, FGF-2, TGF-beta, IL-4, and TNF-alpha. Skeletal muscle formation may provide benefits beyond angiogenesis to patients with chronic peripheral arterial disease or to patients with low cardiac output states who also suffer from skeletal muscle atrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据