4.6 Article

Direct Cost Analysis of Intensive Care Unit Stay in Four European Countries: Applying a Standardized Costing Methodology

期刊

VALUE IN HEALTH
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 81-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.09.007

关键词

comparative study; cost analysis; costing methodology; Europe; intensive care

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Goppingen (Germany)
  3. San Paolo Hospital in Milan (Italy)
  4. Azienda Ospedaliera in Padova (Italy)
  5. Erasmus MC University Medical Center in Rotterdam (the Netherlands)
  6. Gelre Hospitals in Apeldoorn (the Netherlands)
  7. Isala Clinics in Zwolle (the Netherlands)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The objective of the present study was to measure and compare the direct costs of intensive care unit (ICU) days at seven ICU departments in Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom by means of a standardized costing methodology. Methods: A retrospective cost analysis of ICU patients was performed from the hospital's perspective. The standardized costing methodology was developed on the basis of the availability of data at the seven ICU departments. It entailed the application of the bottom-up approach for hotel and nutrition and the top-down approach for diagnostics, consumables, and labor. Results: Direct costs per ICU day ranged from (sic)1168 to (sic)2025. Even though the distribution of costs varied by cost component, labor was the most important cost driver at all departments. The costs for labor amounted to (sic)1629 at department G but were fairly similar at the other departments ((sic)711 +/- 115). Conclusions: Direct costs of ICU days vary widely between the seven departments. Our standardized costing methodology could serve as a valuable instrument to compare actual cost differences, such as those resulting from differences in patient case-mix.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据