4.5 Article

Modeling Phosphorus Uptake by a Growing and Exuding Root System

期刊

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2012.0001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Vienna Science and Technology Fund WWTF [MA07-008]
  2. Austrian Science Fund FWF [T341-N13, V220-N13]
  3. Austrian Academy of Sciences at the Computational Science Center, University of Vienna
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [V 220] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [V220] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mathematical modeling is an important tool in rhizosphere research. Considering that root system and rhizosphere traits govern plant resource efficiency, accurate modeling of nutrient uptake is an important challenge in the light of upcoming shortages of mineral fertilizers and climate change. We present a three-dimensional model for phosphate uptake by a growing and exuding root system. The model is able to predict the influences of gravitropism under geometrical constraints like in pot or rhizotron experiments. In this way it is possible to directly compare the simulated case study to the real experiment. Two specific scales are considered. On the single root scale, we derive a model that describes the transport and competitive sorption of P and citrate in soil. On the whole root system scale, we use this model together with a root growth model to calculate a sink term for P uptake by a growing root system in three dimensions. We show a simulation case study where the P uptake of a young oilseed rape (Brassica napus L. subsp. napus) root system growing in a rhizotron as effected by root exudation is investigated. Results suggest that young parts of the root system are responsible for most of the P uptake after 16 d. Thus the effect of exudation on P uptake is strongly dependent on the age distribution of the root system. By mathematical modeling we hope to increase insight into underlying processes and to provide a flexible tool for experimental design.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据