4.5 Article

Dynamics of fine root, fungal rhizomorphs, and soil respiration in a mixed temperate forest: Integrating sensors and observations

期刊

VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 1055-1064

出版社

SOIL SCI SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2136/vzj2007.0138

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [EF-0410408]
  2. Center for Embedded Networked Sensing [CCR-0120778]
  3. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia
  4. Kearney Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fine roots and rhizomorphs have important implications for the global carbon balance, but the processes underlying these carbon sinks are not well understood. In this study, we coupled continuous minirhizotron observations with an array of solid-state CO(2) sensors. We calculated soil respiration using a gradient flux method. Using a Kaplan-Maier survival analysis, we determined a median longevity of 347 d for fine roots and of 400 d for rhizomorphs. Radiocarbon ((14)C) analysis suggested an age of 7 yr for fine roots < 1 mm and 17 yr for roots of 1 mm in diameter. We found rapid changes in root length (maximum of 38.1 cm m(-2) d(-1)) and rhizomorph length ( maximum of 105.4 cm m(-2) d(-1)) during sampling of four consecutive days. Changes in rhizomorph length were more variable than root length, and rhizomorphs were negatively correlated with daily changes in soil moisture. The variation in root length may be associated to prior environmental conditions. Fine root length was correlated with daily CO(2) production, and variation in daily fine root length could contribute up to 4680 g C ha(-1) d(-1). We observed a clockwise diurnal hysteresis effect in soil respiration with soil temperature that changed in amplitude and shape along the year. Our results show the importance of shorter intervals of minirhizotron measurements to understand rapid fine roots and rhizomorphs variation. Furthermore, continuous minirhizotron measurements should be couple with continuous measurements of multiple sensor arrays to explain biophysical factors that regulate belowground carbon dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据