4.5 Article Publication with Expression of Concern

Bactericidal antibody against a representative epidemiological meningococcal serogroup B panel confirms that MATS underestimates 4CMenB vaccine strain coverage (Publication with Expression of Concern. See vol. 38, pg. 5577, 2020)

期刊

VACCINE
卷 31, 期 43, 页码 4968-4974

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.006

关键词

Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B; 4CMenB vaccine strain coverage; Serum bactericidal antibody assay; MATS; Stratified proportional sampling

资金

  1. Novartis Vaccines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: 4CMenB (Bexsero), a vaccine developed against invasive meningococcal disease caused by capsular group B strains (MenB), was recently licensed for use by the European Medicines Agency. Assessment of 4CMenB strain coverage in specific epidemiologic settings is of primary importance to predict vaccination impact on the burden of disease. The Meningococcal Antigen Typing System (MATS) was developed to predict 4CMenB strain coverage, using serum bactericidal antibody assay with human complement (hSBA) data from a diverse panel of strains not representative of any specific epidemiology. Objective: To experimentally validate the accuracy of MATS-based predictions against strains representative of a specific epidemiologic setting. Methods and results: We used a stratified sampling method to identify a representative sample from all MenB disease isolates collected from England and Wales in 2007-2008, tested the strains in the hSBA assay with pooled sera from infant and adolescent vaccinees, and compared these results with MATS. MATS predictions and hSBA results were significantly associated (P = 0.022). MATS predicted coverage of 70% (95% CI, 55-85%) was largely confirmed by 88% killing in the hSBA (95% CI, 72-95%). MATS had 78% accuracy and 96% positive predictive value against hSBA. Conclusion: MATS is a conservative predictor of strain coverage by the 4CMenB vaccine in infants and adolescents. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据