4.5 Article

Tim-3 alters the balance of IL-12/IL-23 and drives T(H)17 cells: Role in hepatitis B vaccine failure during hepatitis C infection

期刊

VACCINE
卷 31, 期 18, 页码 2238-2245

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.03.003

关键词

Tim-3; IL-12; IL-23; IL-17; Hepatitis B vaccine; Hepatitis C infection

资金

  1. NIH NIDDK [R01DK093526]
  2. Wake Forrest University
  3. East Tennessee State University
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R15AI084057] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK093526] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination is recommended for individuals with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection given their shared risk factors and increased liver-related morbidity and mortality upon super-infection. Vaccine responses in this setting are often blunted, with poor response rates to HBV vaccinations in chronically HCV-infected individuals compared to healthy subjects. In this study, we investigated the role of T cell immunoglobulin mucin domain-3 (Tim-3)-mediated immune regulation in HBV vaccine responses during HCV infection. We found that Tim-3, a marker for T cell exhaustion, was over-expressed on monocytes, leading to a differential regulation of IL-12/IL-23 production which in turn T(H)17 cell accumulation, in HCV-infected HBV vaccine non-responders compared to HCV-infected HBV vaccine responders or healthy subjects (HS). Importantly, ex vivo blockade of Tim-3 signaling corrected the imbalance of IL-12/IL-23 as well as the IL-17 bias observed in HBV vaccine non-responders during HCV infection. These results suggest that Tim-3-mediated dysregulation of innate to adaptive immune responses is involved in HBV vaccine failure in individuals with chronic HCV infection, raising the possibility that blocking this negative signaling pathway might improve the success rate of HBV immunization in the setting of chronic viral infection. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据