4.5 Article

Advax™, a polysaccharide adjuvant derived from delta inulin, provides improved influenza vaccine protection through broad-based enhancement of adaptive immune responses

期刊

VACCINE
卷 30, 期 36, 页码 5373-5381

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.021

关键词

Vaccine; Adjuvant; Influenza; Immunity

资金

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services [HHSN272200800039C, U01AI061142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advax (TM) adjuvant is derived from inulin, a natural plant-derived polysaccharide that when crystallized in the delta polymorphic form, becomes immunologically active. This study was performed to assess the ability of Advax (TM) adjuvant to enhance influenza vaccine immunogenicity and protection. Mice were immunized with influenza vaccine alone or combined with Advax (TM) adjuvant. Immuno-phenotyping of the anti-influenza response was performed including antibody isotypes, B-cell ELISPOT, CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation, influenza-stimulated cytokine secretion, DTH skin tests and challenge with live influenza virus. Advax (TM) adjuvant increased neutralizing antibody and memory B-cell responses to influenza. It similarly enhanced CD4 and CD8 T-cell proliferation and increased influenza-stimulated IL-2, IFN-gamma, IL-5, IL-6, and GM-CSF responses. This translated into enhanced protection against mortality and morbidity in mice. Advax (TM) adjuvant provided significant antigen dose-sparing compared to influenza antigen alone. Protection could be transferred from mice that had received Advax (TM)-adjuvanted vaccine to naive mice by immune serum. Enhanced humoral and T-cell responses induced by Advax (TM)-formulated vaccine were sustained 12 months post-immunization. Advax (TM) adjuvant had low reactogenicity and no adverse events were identified. This suggests Advax (TM) adjuvant could be a useful influenza vaccine adjuvant. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据