4.5 Article

Sendai virus-based RSV vaccine protects African green monkeys from RSV infection

期刊

VACCINE
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 959-968

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.046

关键词

Respiratory syncytial virus; Parainfluenza virus; Jennerian vaccine; Protective immunity

资金

  1. NIH [P30 CA21765, P01 A1054955, R01 A1088729]
  2. TNPRC NIH NCRR [P51RR000164]
  3. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a serious disease of children, responsible for an estimated 160,000 deaths per year worldwide. Despite the ongoing need for global prevention of RSV and decades of research, there remains no licensed vaccine. Sendai virus (SeV) is a mouse parainfluenza virus-type 1 which has been previously shown to confer protection against its human cousin, human parainfluenza virus-type 1 in African green monkeys (AGM). Here is described the study of a RSV vaccine (SeVRSV), produced by reverse genetics technology using SeV as a backbone to carry the full-length gene for RSV F. To test for immunogenicity, efficacy and safety, the vaccine was administered to AGM by intratracheal (it.) and intranasal (in.) routes. Control animals received the empty SeV vector or PBS. There were no booster immunizations. SeV and SeVRSV were cleared from the URT and LRT of vaccinated animals by day 10. Antibodies with specificities toward SeV and RSV were detected in SeVRSV primed animals as early as day ten after immunizations in both sera and nasal wash samples. One month after immunization all test and control AGM received an i.n, challenge with RSV-A2. SeVRSV-vaccinated animals exhibited reduced RSV in the URT compared to controls, and complete protection against RSV in the LRT. There were no clinically relevant adverse events associated with vaccination either before or after challenge. These data encourage advanced testing of the SeVRSV vaccine candidate in clinical trials for protection against RSV. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据