4.5 Article

Broad HIV-1 neutralizing antibody response induced by heterologous gp140/gp145 DNA prime-vaccinia boost immunization

期刊

VACCINE
卷 30, 期 28, 页码 4135-4143

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.04.075

关键词

HIV; Vaccine; Neutralizing antibody; Heterologous prime-boost immunization

资金

  1. China Comprehensive Integrated Programs for Research on AIDS (CIPRA) [U19AI51915]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81020108030]
  3. SKLID Development grant [2008SKLID101]
  4. National Key Projects on Major Infectious Diseases [2008ZX10001-010, 2012ZX10001-008]
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases at the National Institutes of Health, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To develop an effective HIV vaccine strategy that can induce cross-reactive neutralizing antibody. Methods: Codon-optimized gp140 and gp145 env genes derived from HIV-1(cn54), a CRF07 B'/C recombinant strain, were constructed as DNA and recombinant Tiantan vaccinia (rTV) vaccines. The effect of heterologous immunization with gp140 and gp145 was tested in mice and guinea pigs. T cell responses were detected using the IFN-gamma ELISPOT assay. A panel of primary isolates of clade B' and B'/C HIV-1 and TZM-bl cells was used to determine the neutralizing activity of immunized sera. Results: The neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) induced by the heterologous immunogen immunization neutralized all HIV-1 B' and B'/C primary isolates in the guinea pig model. Gp145 and gp140 heterologous prime-boost induced the best neutralizing antibody response with a broad neutralizing spectrum and the highest titer of 1:270 at 6 weeks after the last inoculation. However, the T cell response to HIV-1 peptides was significantly weaker than the gp145+gp145 homologous prime-boost. Conclusions: This heterologous prime-boost immunization strategy could be used to design immunogengenerating broad neutralizing antibodies against genetic variance pathogens. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据