4.5 Article

Immunological priming induced by a two-dose series of H5N1 influenza antigen, administered alone or in combination with two different formulations of AS03 adjuvant in adults: Results of a randomised single heterologous booster dose study at 15 months

期刊

VACCINE
卷 29, 期 37, 页码 6408-6418

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.072

关键词

AS03 Adjuvant System; Influenza vaccines; Influenza A virus; H5N1 subtype

资金

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services
  2. GSK
  3. Wyeth
  4. Novartis
  5. sanofi pasteur
  6. Dymaxion Research
  7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR), Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) [HHS0100200700029C]
  8. GSK Biologicals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One influenza pandemic preparedness strategy involves priming a population with a pre-pandemic subtype-specific vaccine and boosting the immunological response at the time of the pandemic with a strain-matched vaccine. In the current study, adults (n = 469) randomised 15 months previously to receive an A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) influenza vaccine (3.75 mu g haemagglutinin antigen [HA]) administered alone or in combination with an oil-in-water emulsion based Adjuvant System containing 11.86 mg (AS03(A)) or 5.93 mg (AS03(B)) tocopherol per dose, received one booster dose of A/turkey/Turkey/1/2005 (H5N1) vaccine (3.75 mu g HA) with or without AS03(A). An anamnestic antibody response that met US regulatory acceptance criteria was observed 15 months after priming. Although superior immunogenicity of AS03-adjuvanted compared to unadjuvanted priming was not demonstrated, higher antibody titres which persisted longer were seen when both priming and boosting regimens were adjuvanted. This may affect duration of response or heterologous immunity. The booster vaccines had a clinically acceptable safety/reactogenicity profile after adjuvanted or unadjuvanted priming. This study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT00771615. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据