4.5 Article

Immunogenicity and tolerability of a paediatric presentation of a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine in Chilean children aged 1-16 years

期刊

VACCINE
卷 29, 期 48, 页码 8855-8862

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.095

关键词

Vaccination; Hepatitis A; Paediatric; Virosomes

资金

  1. Crucell Switzerland AG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We assessed the immunogenicity of the paediatric dose of Epaxal (R) (0.25 mL) and the degrees of seroprotection achieved with the standard dose (0.5 mL) of Epaxal (R) or a dose of Havrix (R) Junior, in children in an open, randomised, controlled, multi-centre, parallel-group study conducted at 2 Chilean study centres. 360 healthy children and adolescents 12 months to <17 years of age not previously vaccinated against hepatitis A were enrolled. Subjects were randomised 2:2:1 to be vaccinated with either Epaxal (R) 0.25 mL [n = 146], Epaxal (R) 0.5 mL [n = 142] or Havrix (R) Junior In = 72] intramuscularly on Day 1 and after 6 months (26 weeks +/- 14 days). Primary end point was the proportion of subjects seroprotected (anti-HAV antibody concentration >= 10 mIU/mL) in the ATP population at Month 1. All vaccines elicited high seroprotection rates at Month 1: 95.7% with Epaxal (R) 0.25 mL, 99.3% with Epaxal (R) 0.5 mL and 94.0% with Havrix (R) Junior. After the booster vaccination, all subjects demonstrated 100% seroprotection with all vaccines. Antibody concentrations were similarly high in all age groups. The paediatric presentation achieved antibody concentrations similar to those achieved with the 0.5 mL dose across the entire age range, and there were no differences across the range of body weights from 9.0 kg to 82.7 kg. All study vaccines were well tolerated and there were no AEs leading to discontinuation. Thus, the paediatric 0.25 mL dose of Epaxal (R) fulfilled the primary objective of showing non-inferiority to the adult 0.5 mL dose and to Havrix (R) Junior, in terms of seroprotection rates achieved. The results show the paediatric dose of Epaxal (R) to be an attractive option when conducting childhood-vaccination programmes. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据