4.5 Article

The role of complement in innate and adaptive immunity to pneumococcal colonization and sepsis in a murine model

期刊

VACCINE
卷 28, 期 3, 页码 681-685

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.10.085

关键词

Streptococcus pneumoniae; Colonization; Complement; Innate immunity; Adaptive immunity

资金

  1. Ter Meulen Fund
  2. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  3. National Institutes of Health [R01 A1048935, R01 A1066013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Streptococcus pneumoniae is an important bacterial cause of sepsis, meningitis. pneumonia and otitis media. Pneumococcal disease is generally preceded by mucosal colonization with the homologous strain: hence, resistance to colonization may be an important aspect of resistance to disease. In humans, complement deficiency is a risk factor for the development of pneumococcal disease Although many studies have shown protective effects of complement during pneumonia and meningitis, there have been no studies reported that evaluate the role of complement in containment of pneumococcal colonization To this end. we studied the role of complement in preventing the progression of pneumococcal mucosal colonization to sepsis in a mouse model Sepsis developed in 60% of complement-depleted mice following intranasal pneumococcal challenge. but not in control or neutrophil-depleted mice Colonization density in the nasopharynx and local mucosal tissue was similar between complement-depleted and control mice before onset of sepsis Immunization of complement-depleted mice with an intranasally administered whole cell pneumococcal vaccine (WCV) reduced progression towards sepsis and protected surviving mice against colonization comparably to complement-sufficient mice We therefore conclude that complement prevents sepsis following pneumococcal colonization in a neutrophil-independent fashion, but and WCV-induced adaptive immunity is complement-independent. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据