4.5 Article

Enhanced immunogenicity of an oral inactivated cholera vaccine in infants in Bangladesh obtained by zinc supplementation and by temporary withholding breast-feeding

期刊

VACCINE
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1433-1439

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.12.036

关键词

Cholera vaccine; Safety; Zinc; Breast milk; Hypo-responsiveness; Infants

资金

  1. Swedish Agency for International Development and Corporation
  2. Marianne and Markus Wallenberg Foundation
  3. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (ICDDR,B

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The killed oral cholera vaccine Dukoral is recommended for adults and only children over 2 years of age, although cholera is seen frequently ill younger children and there is an urgent need fora vaccine for them. Since decreased immunogenicity of oral vaccines in children in developing countries is a critical problem, we tested interventions to enhance responses to Dukoral. We evaluated the effect on the immune responses by temporarily withholding breast-feeding or by giving zinc supplementation. Two doses of Dukoral consisting of killed cholera vibrios and cholera B Subunit were given to 6-18 months old Bangladeshi children (n = 340) and safety and immunogenicity studied. Our results showed that two doses of the vaccine were safe and induced antibacterial (vibriocidal) antibody responses in 57% and antitoxin responses in 85% of the children. Immune responses were comparable after intake of one and two doses. Temporary withholding breast-feeding for 3 h before immunization or supplementation with 20 mg of zinc per day for 42 days resulted in increased magnitude of vibriocidal antibodies (77% and 79% responders, respectively). Administration of vaccines without buffer or in water did not result in reduction of vibriocidal responses. This study demonstrates that the vaccine is safe and immunogenic in children under 2 years of age and that simple interventions can enhance immune responses in young children. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd, All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据