4.5 Article

Replication of rubella vaccine population genetic studies: Validation of HLA genotype and humoral response associations

期刊

VACCINE
卷 27, 期 49, 页码 6926-6931

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.08.109

关键词

Rubella vaccine; HLA antigens; Antibody formation; Adolescent

资金

  1. National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) [AI 48793, AI 33144, 1 UL1 RR024150-01]
  2. National Institutes of Health
  3. NIH Roadmap for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purported genetic associations found in population studies require validation for confirmation. We previously reported rubella vaccine-induced immune responses and HLA associations in 346 adolescents, age 12-18 years (1st cohort), following two doses of a rubella-containing vaccine. We sought to replicate the associations discovered in that work by verifying these associations in a new cohort of 396 subjects, age 11-19 years (2nd cohort), all having had two doses of a rubella-containing vaccine. We found that B*2705 (median 1st cohort 20.9 IU/ml, p =0.028: 2nd cohort 20.5 IU/ml, p =0.001) and DPA1*0201 (median 1st cohort 32.5 IU/ml, p=0.048; 2nd cohort 25.8 IU/ml, p =0.025) alleles were consistently associated with lower rubella-induced antibodies. Further, DPB1*0401 (median 1st cohort 43.5 IU/ml,p =0.021; 2nd cohort 36.2 IU/ml, p =0.002) alleles were associated with higher antibody levels in both populations. The association of DRB1*04-DQB1*03-DPB1*03 (mean 1st cohort 25.2 IU/ml, p =0.011; 2nd cohort 21.4 IU/ml, p =0.032) and DRB1*15/16-DQBI*06-DPB1*03 (1st cohort 16.3 IU/ml, p=0.043; 2nd cohort 19.1 IU/ml, p =0.023) haplotypes with lower rubella-specific antibodies was observed in both studies. This study provides confirmatory evidence for an association between specific class I and II HLA markers and haplotypes with rubella vaccine-induced humoral responses and lends further weight to their influence on rubella immune responses. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据