4.5 Article

Immune responses in the airways by nasal vaccination with systemic boosting against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in chronic lung diseased

期刊

VACCINE
卷 27, 期 21, 页码 2755-2759

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.010

关键词

Chronic obstructive lung disease; Cystic fibrosis; P. aeruginosa; Mucosal vaccination; Outer membrane proteins

资金

  1. Philips Respironics Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rationale: Pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas (P.)aeruginosa is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic lung diseases. Systemic vaccination in patients with cystic fibrosis has been only successful in part. Mucosal vaccination could lead to enhanced airway immunogenicity. Pathogen specific secretory IgA antibodies could prevent bacterial invasion into the lung mucosa. Objectives: A phase 1-2 mucosal vaccination trial with an intranasal P. aeruginosa vaccine was performed. Methods: 12 patients with Chronic lung diseases (8 COPD, 2 cystic fibrosis, 1 bronchiectasis, 1 histiocytosis X) were vaccinated three times intranasally followed by a systemic booster vaccination with a recombinant hybrid protein encompassing the main protective epitopes of two outer membrane proteins of P.aeruginosa. Mucosal and systemic antibody responses were measured after boosting and after a half-year follow-up compared to a representative control cohort. Measurements: Specific IgG and IgA antibodies in the patient's sera, saliva and sputum were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and IgG Subclass distributions were defined with monoclonal Mouse antibodies. Results: Both forms of vaccination were well tolerated. Significant elevated IgA and IgG antibodies could be measured in sputum, saliva and in the sera of 11/12 patients. Conclusions: Mucosal vaccination followed by systemic boost with an Outer membrane protein vaccine against P aeruginosa leads to airway immunogenicity against the pathogen. Further clinical trials Should elucidate the Protective efficacy of this vaccination method. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据