4.5 Article

Importance of subunit vaccine antigen of major Fli C antigenic site of Salmonella Enteritidis II: A challenge trial

期刊

VACCINE
卷 27, 期 11, 页码 1680-1684

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.01.024

关键词

Salmonella Enteritidis (SE); Colonization-suppression; g.m. antigen site of Fli C (SEp 9); Chickens not showing inhibitory effect on bacterial growth

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis (SE) infection in chickens shows a mild pathogenicity except for Young ages, compared with other animals, and laying hens sometimes produce SE-contaminated eggs leading to public health concerns. To reduce the problem, SE bacterin in Poultry farms has been applied. We previously demonstrated that a subunit antigen, g.m. part polypeptide in SE-Fli C (SEp 9), could be a candidate subunit antigen of SE vaccine which may show less side effects in chickens. In this study, we used SEp 9 along with an adjuvant to inoculate chickens, then the chickens were orally challenged with SE, and Suppression of the SE count in the cecum was investigated. Chickens inoculated with a commercial SE vaccine were prepared as positive controls (vaccine group), and those with physiological saline (control group) for comparison of the bacterial count after challenge. Employing two types of antibody-detection ELISA coated with either de-flagellated SE or SEp 9, specific antibody levels in blood and the intestine were determined. The bacterial count was significantly lower 1 and 3 weeks after challenge in the SEp 9 than in the control group. Specific antibody only against SEp 9 in blood but not the intestine of these birds in the SEp 9 group was detected. This study confirmed that SEp 9 antigen is a major effective antigen in SE inactivated vaccine, and it is suggested that only the subunit vaccine antigen SEp 9 is needed to effectively suppress colonization in the chicken intestine, without the need for other SE component antigens. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据