4.5 Review

Evaluation of a measles vaccine campaign in Ethiopia using oral-fluid antibody surveys

期刊

VACCINE
卷 26, 期 37, 页码 4769-4774

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.005

关键词

measles campaign evaluation

资金

  1. Ministry of Health
  2. Regional Health Bureau
  3. Zonal Health Departments
  4. Assela Health Centre
  5. Kebele Administration Offices
  6. National Ethical Committee of the Ethiopian Science and Technology Commission [RDHE/84-31/2000]
  7. Coventry Research Ethics Committee, UK
  8. The Council of Regional State of Oromia Health Bureau [QEFAIO/2-7/1745]
  9. World Health Organisation Department of Vaccines and Biologicals [V21/181/133]
  10. BASICS, USA
  11. British Council (Higher Education LINK)
  12. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We undertook a study to demonstrate the potential contribution of oral-fluid (OF) antibody prevalence surveys in evaluating measles vaccine campaigns. In Asela town, southern Ethiopia, oral fluids were collected from 1928 children aged 9 months to 5 years attending for campaign immunization in December 1999 and 6 months later, from 745 individuals aged 9 months to 19 years, in the same location. Measles antibody status was determined by microimmune measles specific IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Antibody prevalence was estimated at 48% in children attending for vaccination (pre-campaign), and 85% post-campaign in the comparable age group. The estimated reduction in the susceptible proportion was 75%. In older children the proportion antibody negative post-campaign was 28% in 7-9 year olds, and 13% in 10-14 year olds levels of susceptibility which raise concern over continued measles transmission. This is the first evaluation of a measles vaccine campaign based on oral-fluid seroprevalence surveys and it demonstrates the merit of oral-fluid surveys in informing health authorities about vaccination strategy refinement. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据