4.4 Article

Temporal Trend in Incidental Prostate Cancer Detection at Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 122, 期 -, 页码 152-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.07.028

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cancer Center Support Grant from the National Cancer Institute [P30-CA008748]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA008748] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE To assess changes in the rate of incidental prostate cancer (PCa) after benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery over the last decade. MATERIALS AND METHODS We identified 1177 patients surgically treated for BPH (open prostatectomy, transurethral resection or holmium laser enucleation [HoLEP] of the prostate) in 2007-2016 at a single European academic center. Local polynomial regression was used to explore changes in the rate of incidental PCa detected after BPH surgery and of preoperative biopsy performed over time. Logistic regression analyses tested the association of incidental PCa diagnosis with year of surgery and preoperative biopsy. RESULTS Incidental PCa was found in 6.4% (74) of cases, 67(91%) with Grade group 1 disease. We observed an increased incidence of PCa diagnosis after BPH surgery over time (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12; 95%confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.24, P = .02) along with a concomitant decrease in the rate of preoperative prostate biopsies (OR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.79-0.88, P < .0001). Patients undergoing a preoperative biopsy showed a lower risk of being diagnosed with PCa after surgery (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.72 P = .007). Patients treated with HoLEP had a higher chance of incidental PCa detection (OR: 2.28; 95%CI: 1.30-4.00; P = .004), although this may be related to the significantly higher number of HoLEP performed over the last years. CONCLUSION The increased rate of low-risk PCa detected after BPH surgery in the last decade reflects the clinical practice changes in PCa screening and diagnosis leading to a reduced number of unnecessary biopsies and indolent cancer diagnosis. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据