4.4 Article

What Are the Outcomes of Radical Prostatectomy for High-risk Prostate Cancer?

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 76, 期 3, 页码 710-714

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.09.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P50 CA058236, P50 CA058236-14, P30 CA006973] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To examine the long-term survival following radical prostatectomy in the population with high-risk prostate cancer. Despite considerable stage migration associated with widespread prostate-specific antigen screening, as many as one-third of incident prostate cancers have high-risk features. These patients are often treated with combined radiation and androgen deprivation therapy, and less is known about the long-term survival in this population after radical prostatectomy (RP). METHODS Between 1992 and 2008, 175 men underwent RP by a single surgeon with D'Amico high-risk prostate cancer (clinical stage >= T2c, biopsy Gleason score 8-10, or prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL). In this population, we examined the rates and predictors of biochemical progression, metastatic disease, and cancer-specific mortality. RESULTS Among 175 high-risk patients, 63 (36%) had organ-confined disease in the RP specimen. At 10 years, biochemical recurrence-free survival was 68%, metastasis-free survival was 84%, and prostate cancer-specific survival was 92%. The 10-year rate of freedom from any hormonal therapy was 71%. Of the high-risk criteria, a biopsy Gleason score of 8-10 (vs < 7) was the strongest independent predictor of biochemical recurrence, metastases, and prostate cancer death. CONCLUSIONS National data suggest that RP may be underutilized for the management of high-risk clinically localized prostate cancer. Our data suggest that surgical treatment can result in long-term progression-free survival in a subset of carefully selected high-risk men. Further prospective studies are warranted to directly compare the outcomes of RP vs combined radiation and hormonal therapy in high-risk patients. UROLOGY 76: 710-714, 2010. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据