4.4 Article

Vascular Stapling of the Inferior Vena Cava: Further Refinement of Techniques for the Excision of Extensive Renal Cell Carcinoma With Unresectable Vena-caval Involvement

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 74, 期 4, 页码 846-850

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.04.075

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To present our experience with a novel technique of tumor removal: en bloc resection of the tumor, thrombus, and inferior vena cava (IVC) via vascular staple ligation and excision, and to excise all tumor, which may include a portion of the IVC when invasion is present. Management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with IVC thrombus presents a challenge. Options for tumor excision include thrombectomy with or without cardiopulmonary bypass, replacement of the cava with synthetic or venous graft, or caval excision without replacement. METHODS Six patients with extensive RCC with IVC thrombus were evaluated. All patients underwent preoperative imaging that depicted completely obstructing IVC thrombus of varying cranial extension with apparent invasion of the caval wall. None had lower extremity edema. Patients underwent IVC staple ligation and en bloc resection of tumor and thrombus. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative as well as pathological factors were measured. These included estimated blood loss, transfusions, and procedure length. Inpatient factors including duration of intubation, length of intensive care unit stay, and overall length of stay were recorded. Tumor-free status was evaluated. RESULTS All patients had Fuhrman Grade 4 RCC. No perioperative deaths occurred. Mean estimated blood loss was 6350 mL (range 900-25 000). Length of intubation averaged 1.5 days. Mean intensive care unit stay was 4.3 days. Overall length of stay averaged 9.3 days. CONCLUSIONS Complete excision of a portion of the IVC, using a vascular stapler in conjunction with radical nephrectomy is a satisfactory method to remove RCC with IVC invasion. Sufficient collateral circulation exists for venous return from the lower extremities. UROLOGY 74: 846-850, 2009. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据