4.4 Article

Prostatic-specific Antigen Velocity After Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Possible Predictor for the Assessment of Treatment Effect Durability for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Detection of Malignancy

期刊

UROLOGY
卷 74, 期 5, 页码 1105-1110

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.06.039

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV) as an indicator for effectiveness and durability of size reduction after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). Additionally, PSAV monitoring in the detection of prostate cancer was also evaluated. METHODS Between 1998 and 2006, we reviewed the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) data of 335 men who underwent HoLEP and had a complete PSA data including preoperative PSA, postoperative PSA (reset), and a minimum of 2 annual PSA readings after PSA reset. PSAV was calculated by 3 methods-simple arithmetic method, linear regression method, and rate method. RESULTS In the benign group, the mean PSA dropped from 5.44 to 0.91 ng/mL (P <0.001). The prostate cancer patients who were newly discovered in the follow-Lip period had significantly higher baseline PSA (P = .032) and significantly lower PSA reduction than that of the benign group (75.39% vs 47:49%, P <.001). PSAV was calculated by 3 different methods and produced identical results' however, linear regression method produced significantly lower estimates at 7 years. In the malignant group, the mean PSAV at 1 and 3 years was higher than that of the benign group (1.28 vs 0.13 and 2.4 vs 0.09, P <0.022, 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS HoLEP results in a significant reduction in PSA that remained at lower levels during follow-up, suggesting that the glandular size reduction after HoLEP is durable. Monitoring of PSAV is important in long-term follow-up of patients for prostatic carcinoma detection after prostatic surgery. UROLOGY 74: 1105-1110, 2009. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据