4.4 Article

The characteristics of bladder cancer after radiotherapy for prostate cancer

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.04.006

关键词

Prostatic neoplasms; Urinary bladder neoplasms; Radiotherapy; Neoplasms; Second primary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Prostate radiotherapy (RT) has been associated with an increased risk of bladder cancer (CaB). However it is unknown how prior RT affects the stage, grade, and histology of secondary CaB. While irradiated patients have adverse surgical outcomes, how RT affects survival is also unknown. We sought to determine how RT for prostate cancer (CaP) affects the characteristics and outcomes of secondary CaB. Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 275,200 cases of clinically localized CaP submitted to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 1988 and 2007 was performed. CaP treatment was stratified by radical prostatectomy (RP) alone, RT, or RP + RT. Diagnosis of CaB at least 1 year after CaP, and CaB death were the primary outcomes. The stage, grade, and histology of CaB of patients exposed to RT or RP were compared. A competing risks multivariable survival analysis was performed to determine the effect of RT on CaB-specific mortality. Results: CaP patients treated with any RT were 1.70 times as likely to develop CaB (95% CI 1.57-1.86, P < 0.001) compared with RP alone. CaB in men who had RT were more likely non-urothelial (6.4% vs. 3.8%, P = 0.004), trigonal (6.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.012), and carcinoma in-situ (CIS) (9.2% vs. 7.0%, P < 0.001) compared with RP. RT increased CaB-specific mortality (HR = 1.30, P = 0.02), which remained significant when adjusted for CaB features (HR = 1.28, P = 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with localized CaP treated with RT have a higher risk of CaB. CaB after RT is more likely to be located at the trigone and contain CIS. Patients with CaB after RT have decreased cancer-specific survival compared with those undergoing RP alone. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据