4.7 Review

Association between residential greenness and birth weight: Systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 13, 期 4, 页码 621-629

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.09.004

关键词

Birth weight; Birth outcomes; Green spaces; Greenness; Meta-analysis; Pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Birth weight is extensively investigated as an outcome of interacting with greenery in mothers' living environment, because it is one of the major causes for neonatal and infant mortality, as well as a correlate of some adverse effects in childhood and beyond. Conversely, in modern urban-ecological systems the access to greenery is limited. The aim of this study was to answer the question whether green spaces and generally greenery in the living environment of pregnant women are associated with the birth weight of their infants and what the direction of that effect is. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Internet were searched for relevant publications in English and Spanish. Eight studies were identified and included in the analyses (total n = 214940). We report quality effects meta-analyses based on correlation and standardized regression coefficients as estimates of effect size. Neighbourhood greenness within 100-m buffer was weakly and positively associated with birth weight. The pooled correlation coefficient was 0.049 (95% CI: 0.039, 0.059) and the pooled standardized regression coefficient was 0.001 (95% CI: -0.001, 0.003). There was, however, considerable heterogeneity between the studies. Using more sensitive measures for greenness and taking into account green space functionality and quality, adjusting for environmental exposures, and assessing individual attitudes towards nature, might yield clearer picture, higher statistical power and more precise results in future research. Our findings endorse the emphasis put on urban forestry and landscape management as closely related to public health and propose a more naturalistic, humanitarian and person-centered approach in future studies. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据