4.7 Article

Fertilizer effects of increasing loads of composts and biosolids in urban greening

期刊

URBAN FORESTRY & URBAN GREENING
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 231-238

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.04.001

关键词

Grass cover; Plant available nitrogen; Sewage sludge; Waste based products

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway [173496/130]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The fertilizer effect of increasing loads (4, 8 and 12 kg dm m(-2)) of four waste-based products (biosolid amended with Ca(OH)(2), biosolid without lime amendment, biosolid compost and biowaste compost) was compared to mineral fertilization (10-30 kg N m(-2)) in a 2-year pot experiment with perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne, cv. Napoleon). Addition of 4 kg dm m(-2) of biosolids to the soil resulted in a fast establishment of grass cover and moderate grass growth the first and second year. The highest load of biosolids resulted in growth significantly higher than mineral fertilization with 30 g nitrogen m(-2) the first season. Addition of biowaste compost had an equivalent effect on plant growth during establishment and first growing season as 10-20 g nitrogen m(-2) for all application levels, whereas biosolid compost had no effect on plant growth. Plant-available nitrogen (PAN) varied between 16 and 27% of N added by the biosolids in the first year depending on biosolid type and load. PAN was lower for the biosolid amended with lime (Ca(OH)(2)) than for the biosolid with no lime addition. For biowaste compost first year PAN was 6-11%, whereas the biosolid compost had no nitrogen fertilizer effect. The second year PAN was lower. varying between 0.8 and 6.8% for biosolids and biowaste compost. When establishing a grass cover, the biosolids should be used in moderate loads to avoid too intensive plant growth. As the biowaste compost has a lower nitrogen fertilizer effect, it can be used in higher loads than the biosolids. The biosolid compost should be regarded as a soil amendment with no nitrogen fertilizer effect. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据