4.2 Review

In Vivo Anti-Candida Activity of Phenolic Extracts and Compounds: Future Perspectives Focusing on Effective Clinical Interventions

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2015, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2015/247382

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) [SFRH/BD/87658/2012]
  2. Programa Operacional, Fatores de competitividade-COMPETE
  3. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia) [FCT PTDC/SAU-MIC/119069/2010, RECI/EBB-EBI/0179/2012, PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013]
  4. Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON. 2-O Novo Norte)
  5. QREN
  6. FEDER
  7. [PEst-OE/AGR/UI0690/2014]
  8. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PEst-OE/EQB/LA0023/2013, PEst-OE/AGR/UI0690/2014, PTDC/SAU-MIC/119069/2010, RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012, SFRH/BD/87658/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Candida species have increasingly deserved a special attention among the medical community. In spite of the presence of Candida species as a human commensal, alarming rates of local and systemic infections have been observed, varying from moderate to severe impact. Currently available antifungal drugs have progressively lost their effectiveness, pointing urgently the problem of the microorganisms with acquired-resistance. Natural matrices are secularly used for numerous purposes, being inclusive and highly effective as antimicrobials. Increasing evidence gives a particular emphasis to the contribution of phenolic extracts and related individual compounds. In vitro studies clearly confirm their prominent effects, but the confirmation through in vivo studies, including the involved mechanisms of action, is not so much deepened. Therefore, the present report aims to provide extensive knowledge about all these aspects, highlighting the most efficient phytochemical formulations, including therapeutic doses. Further studies need to be incited to deepen knowledge on this area, namely, focused on clinical trials to provide safer and more effective antimicrobials than the current ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据