4.5 Article

THE B-MODE IMAGE-GUIDED ULTRASOUND ATTENUATION PARAMETER ACCURATELY DETECTS HEPATIC STEATOSIS IN CHRONIC LIVER DISEASE

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 44, 期 11, 页码 2223-2232

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.06.017

关键词

Controlled attenuation parameter; Liver steatosis; Diagnostic ultrasound; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; Chronic hepatitis C; Prospective studies

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP16K09371]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of our study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP) for the detection of hepatic steatosis in comparison with the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), using histopathology as the reference standard. We prospectively analyzed 163 consecutive chronic liver disease patients who underwent UGAP, CAP, computed tomography and a liver biopsy on the same day between April 2016 and July 2017. Radiofrequency signals corresponding to the images were compensated by the reference signal previously measured from the uniform phantom with known attenuation (0.44 dB/cm/MHz). The attenuation coefficient was calculated from the signals' decay slope. The median attenuation coefficient values in patients with S0 (n = 62), 51 (n = 63), S2 (n = 23) and S3 grade (n = 15) were 0.485, 0.560, 0.660 and 0.720, respectively. Significant correlations were found between attenuation coefficient and percentage steatosis, CAP values and liver-to-spleen computed tomography attenuation ratio (p < 0.001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of UGAP for identifying >= S1, >= S2 and >= S3 were 0.900, 0.953 and 0.959, respectively, which were significantly better than the results obtained with CAP for identifying >= S2 and >= S3. In conclusion, UGAP had high diagnostic accuracy for detecting hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic liver disease, (C) 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据