4.5 Article

3-D HIGH-FREQUENCY ULTRASOUND BACKSCATTER ANALYSIS OF HUMAN ARTICULAR CARTILAGE

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 40, 期 1, 页码 244-257

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2013.08.015

关键词

Backscatter; Cartilage; Degeneration; Envelope statistics; High-frequency ultrasound; Osteoarthritis; Quantitative ultrasound; Spectral slope; Ultrasound bio-microscopy; Ultrasound spectroscopy

资金

  1. German Research Council (DFG) [Ra1380/6]
  2. Deutsche Arthrose-Hilfe e.V.
  3. DFG through the Berlin-Brandenburg School for Regenerative Therapies [GSC 203]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-frequency ultrasound is a promising method for non-invasive characterization of cartilage degeneration. Surface reflection and integrated spectral parameters are often used. In the work described here, human cartilage samples with varying degrees of degeneration were measured using a 40-MHz transducer. Backscatter signals originating from the superficial and transitional zones of cartilage were analyzed using amplitude, spectral and envelope statistical parameters and related to degenerative changes of the matrix given by the Mankin score. The results indicate an increased sensitivity of spectral slope and envelope statistical parameters to early matrix degeneration compared with conventional amplitude parameters. Furthermore, moderate correlations of chondrocyte number with backscatter amplitude and envelope statistics were observed, suggesting that at high frequencies, cells are one important scattering source in cartilage. An application of spectral and envelope statistical parameters to intra-articular ultrasound arthroscopy is conceivable and could improve the diagnostic potential of these examinations. Future studies are necessary to clarify the contributions of chondrocytes, extracellular matrix and collagen content to ultrasound backscatter to further improve the diagnostic potential of ultrasound for cartilage assessment. (C) 2014 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据