4.5 Article

CALIBRATION OF THE 1-MHZ SONITRON ULTRASOUND SYSTEM

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 1762-1766

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.05.020

关键词

Sonoporation; Drug and gene delivery; Transducer calibration

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL74002, HL59586]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Successful drug and gene delivery across cellular membranes can lead to improved therapeutic outcomes. Recent studies have suggested that sonoporation may enhance drug and gene delivery across cellular membranes. The enhancement may be a result of transient permeation of the membrane from cavitation or micro-streaming effects of microbubbles exposed to ultrasound. Given limited acoustic pressure calibration and beam profile characterization of the Sonitron ultrasound systems in cellular bioeffects studies previously published, the objective of this work was to calibrate the acoustic output and explore the potential for standing waves in a cell-well plate. In this study, three 1-MHz transducers driven by Sonitron ultrasound systems, which have been used in a number of sonoporation studies, were calibrated. Transducers with 10-mm, 6-mm and 20-mm-diameter apertures (Sonitron 1000 and 2000, Rich-Mar, Inola, OK, USA) were calibrated using polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) needle hydrophones. Axial and transverse beam profiles were obtained, and the pressures were measured as a function of Sonitron intensity dial setting and duty cycle. The acoustic intensity was calculated and compared with the Sonitron intensity dial setting for duty cycles from 10-100%. Standing waves caused by reflections from the hydrophone holder were detected for each transducer. This observation may also have implications for in vitro sonoporation studies. Acoustic field characterization is an important first step in understanding the mechanisms of sonoporation and drug delivery across biomembranes. (E-mail: kopechja@uc.edu) (C) 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据