4.5 Article

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THE SONOGRAPHIC ACCELERATION OF THE MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY RECANALIZATION: RESULTS OF THE PILOT THROMBOTRIPSY STUDY

期刊

ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 34, 期 11, 页码 1775-1782

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.04.002

关键词

Ultrasound; Artery recanalization; Stroke therapy; Ischemia; Thrombolysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim was to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of continuous ultrasound monitoring of the artery occlusion area (sonothrombotripsy) in patients with acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. A total of 52 consecutive patients with acute MCA occlusion were included in the thrombotripsy group. Doppler monitoring of the region of occlusion was performed for up to 45 min. The control group was created from the NAIS study database. Patients were matched for their vascular status, age, sex, artery occlusion, NIHSS at admission, rt-PA treatment and time to the first ultrasound examination. The number of recanalized arteries at 6 and 24 h after the onset of symptoms, the number of independent patients (mRS 0-2 versus 3-6) after 90 d, and the number of serious adverse events were statistically evaluated. In the thrombotripsy group, 19 patients (36.5%) had complete recanalization and 27 (51.9%) patients had partial recanalization at I h after the start of the TCCS monitoring. Higher recanalization rates at 6 and 24 h after stoke onset were also seen compared with controls (69.2% versus 7.7% and 92.3% versus 61.5% complete recanalizations, respectively, p < 0.05). Independence (mRS 0-2) at day 90 was achieved by 61.5% of the thrombotripsy patients and 32.7% controls, p < 0.05, odds ratio 1.88 (95% confidence interval = 1.23 - 2.90). In both groups, two symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages and one symptomatic brain edema occurred. Sonothrombotripsy with diagnostic transcranial duplex technology is safe and may offer benefit in addition to standard of care stroke treatment. (E-mail: skoloudik@hotmaii.com) (C) 2008 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据