4.2 Article

Rapamycin Protects from Type-I Peritoneal Membrane Failure Inhibiting the Angiogenesis, Lymphangiogenesis, and Endo-MT

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2015, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2015/989560

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias (FIS), Instituto Carlos-III [PI 12/01175]
  2. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [S2010/BMD-2321]
  3. European Union, Seventh Framework Program EuTRiPD under Grant agreement Marie Curie [ITN-GA-2011-287813]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2013-47611R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Preservation of peritoneal membrane (PM) is essential for long-term survival in peritoneal dialysis (PD). Continuous presence of PD fluids (PDF) in the peritoneal cavity generates chronic inflammation and promotes changes of the PM, such as fibrosis, angiogenesis, and lymphangiogenesis. Mesothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (MMT) and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (Endo-MT) seem to play a central role in this pathogenesis. We speculated that Rapamycin, a potent immunosuppressor, could be beneficial by regulating blood and lymphatic vessels proliferation. We demonstrate that mice undergoing a combined PD and Rapamycin treatment (PDF + Rapa group) presented a reduced PM thickness and lower number of submesothelial blood and lymphatic vessels, as well as decreased MMT and Endo-MT, comparing with their counterparts exposed to PD alone (PDF group). Peritonealwater transport in the PDF + Rapa group remained at control level, whereas PD effluent levels of VEGF, TGF-beta andTNF-alpha were lower than in the PDF group. Moreover, the treatment of mesothelial cells with Rapamycin in vitro significantly decreased VEGF synthesis and selectively inhibited the VEGF-C and VEGF-D release when compared with control cells. Thus, Rapamycin has a protective effect on PM in PD through an antifibrotic and antiproliferative effect on blood and lymphatic vessels. Moreover, it inhibits Endo-MT and, at least partially, MMT.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据