4.7 Article

Mode-switching: A new technique for electronically varying the agglomeration position in an acoustic particle manipulator

期刊

ULTRASONICS
卷 50, 期 1, 页码 68-75

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2009.07.010

关键词

Ultrasonic particle manipulation; Acoustic radiation force; Layered resonators; Microfluidics; Mode-switching

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/D03454X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/D03454X/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic radiation forces offer a means of manipulating particles within a fluid. Much interest in recent years has focussed on the use of radiation forces in microfluidic (or lab on a chip) devices. Such devices are well matched to the use of ultrasonic standing waves in which the resonant dimensions of the chamber are smaller than the ultrasonic wavelength in use. However, such devices have typically been limited to moving particles to one or two predetermined planes, whose positions are determined by acoustic pressure nodes/anti-nodes set up in the ultrasonic standing wave. In most cases devices have been designed to move particles to either the centre or (more recently) the side of a flow channel using ultrasonic frequencies that produce a half or quarter wavelength over the channel, respectively. It is demonstrated here that by rapidly switching back and forth between half and quarter wavelength frequencies - mode-switching - a new agglomeration position is established that permits beads to be brought to any arbitrary point between the half and quarter-wave nodes. This new agglomeration position is effectively a position of stable equilibrium. This has many potential applications, particularly in cell sorting and manipulation. It should also enable precise control of agglomeration position to be maintained regardless of manufacturing tolerances, temperature variations, fluid medium characteristics and particle concentration. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据