4.7 Article

Continuous-wave ultrasound reflectometry for surface roughness imaging applications

期刊

ULTRASONICS
卷 49, 期 1, 页码 10-14

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.06.011

关键词

Continuous-wave; Ultrasound; Reflectometry; Surface roughness imaging; Phase; Nondestructive imaging

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R33EB000535, R21EB000535] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R33 EB000535, EB 00535-04, R33 EB000535-04, R21 EB000535] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Measurement of surface roughness irregularities that result from various sources such as manufacturing processes, surface damage, and corrosion, is an important indicator of product quality for many nondestructive testing ( NDT) industries. Many techniques exist, however because of their qualitative, time-consuming and direct-contact modes, it is of some importance to work out new experimental methods and efficient tools for quantitative estimation of surface roughness. Objective and Method: Here we present continuous-wave ultrasound reflectometry ( CWUR) as a novel nondestructive modality for imaging and measuring surface roughness in a non-contact mode. In CWUR, voltage variations due to phase shifts in the reflected ultrasound waves are recorded and processed to form an image of surface roughness. Results: An acrylic test block with surface irregularities ranging from 4.22 mu m to 19.05 mu m as measured by a coordinate measuring machine ( CMM), is scanned by an ultrasound transducer having a diameter of 45 mm, a focal distance of 70 mm, and a central frequency of 3 MHz. It is shown that CWUR technique gives very good agreement with the results obtained through CMM inasmuch as the maximum average percent error is around 11.5%. Conclusion: Images obtained here demonstrate that CWUR may be used as a powerful non-contact and quantitative tool for nondestructive inspection and imaging of surface irregularities at the micron-size level with an average error of less than 11.5%. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据