4.2 Article

Extramedullary Manifestation in Multiple Myeloma Bears High Incidence of Poor Cytogenetic Aberration and Novel Agents Resistance

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2015, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2015/787809

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372540, 81302040]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2012485]
  3. National Public Health Grand Research Foundation [201202017]
  4. Program for Development of Innovative Research Teams in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
  5. Project of National Key Clinical Specialty, National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2014BAI09B12]
  6. Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Medical Science [BL2014086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extramedullary disease (EMD) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients is an uncommon event and more attention was directed toward the feature of these patients. Cytogenetic aberration is an important characteristic of MM and is associated with patients' outcome. In this study, we aimed to compare the cytogenetic abnormality of patients with and without extramedullary manifestation, and to analyze the clinical outcomes of novel agents in EMD patients. We retrospectively investigated data from 41 MM patients. Our analyses showed del(17p13) in 31% of EMD versus 13% of medullary disease (P = 0.03) andamp(1q21) in 55% versus 32%(P = 0.019). No differences were shown in del(13q14) and t(4; 14). 24/27 patients with EMD at diagnosis responded to the novel agents-containing regimens. However, when relapsed, 70% of patients did not benefit from the sequential use of novel agents as salvage therapy. In 14 patients who developed EMD at relapse phase, only 2 patients responded to novel agents therapy. Median overall survival of patients with extramedullary manifestations was 30 months, in comparison to 104 months for patients without EMD (P = 0.002). Patients with extramedullary manifestation bore high incidence of poor cytogenetic aberration and novel agents resistance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据