4.1 Article

Down-regulation of HDAC5 inhibits growth of human hepatocellular carcinoma by induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 11, 页码 11523-11532

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2358-2

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Cell proliferation; HDAC5; shRNA

类别

资金

  1. State Major Science and Technology Special Projects during the period of China State [2012ZX10002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) play a critical role in the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of cancer cells. An obstacle for the application of HDAC inhibitors as effective anti-cancer therapeutics is that our current knowledge on the contributions of different HDACs in various cancer types remains scarce. The present study reported that the mRNA and protein levels of HDAC5 were up-regulated in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissues and cells as shown by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blot. MTT assay and BrdU incorporation assay showed that the down-regulation of HDAC5 inhibited cell proliferation in HepG2, Hep3B, and Huh7 cell lines. Data from in vivo xenograft tumorigenesis model also demonstrated the anti-proliferative effect of HDAC5 depletion on tumor cell growth. Furthermore, the suppression of HDAC5 promoted cell apoptosis and induced G1-phase cell cycle arrest in HCC cells. On the molecular level, we observed altered expression of apoptosis-related proteins such as p53, bax, bcl-2, cyto C, and caspase 3 in HDAC5-shRNA-transfected cells. Knockdown of HDAC5 led to a significant up-regulation of p21 and down-regulation of cyclin D1 and CDK2/4/6. We also found that the down-regulation of HDAC5 substantially increased p53 stability and promoted its nuclear localization and transcriptional activity. Our study suggested that knockdown of HDAC5 could inhibit cancer cell proliferation by the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis; thus, suppression of HDAC5 may be a viable option for treating HCC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据