4.1 Article

HuR expression is a marker of poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 481-487

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-010-0141-6

关键词

Prognosis; Immunohistochemistry; Surgery; Survival; HuR; COX-2

类别

资金

  1. Finnish Medical Fund
  2. Cancer Association of Northern Finland
  3. Finnish Urological Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The HuR protein is a nucleocytoplasmic protein which plays an important role in the regulation of mRNA stability, and dysregulation of its expression has been linked to carcinogenesis. We studied 152 patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who underwent surgery for the removal of kidney tumours between 1990 and 1999. The mean follow-up was 90 months. The expression of HuR and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) was determined by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibodies. The immunostaining results were associated with patient age, clinical stage, Fuhrman grade and patient outcome. Cytoplasmic expression of HuR and COX-2 was positive in 37 (25%) and 22 (15%) of the tumours, respectively. The expression of HuR was associated with stage. The expression of COX-2 was associated with stage and nuclear grade. The RCC-specific survival was reduced in patients whose tumours expressed HuR or COX-2. The hazard ratio (HR) of patients with HuR-expressing tumours was 2.18 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.16-4.09; p = 0.015) and the HR of patients with COX-2-expressing tumours was 2.29 (95% CI, 1.15-4.54; p = 0.018). In the Cox regression analysis the only independent prognostic factor was stage (p < 0.001). Treatment of an RCC cell line (769-P) with HuR-targeted small interfering RNA resulted in the reduced expression of HuR and COX-2. We conclude that cytoplasmic HuR expression is associated with reduced RCC-specific survival. The HuR protein regulates the expression of COX-2 in RCC cells, which is one potential mechanism of action for the HuR-associated aggressive behaviour of RCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据