4.1 Article

Expressions of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and hexokinase-II in gastric adenocarcinoma: the impact on prognosis and correlation to clinicopathologic features

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 159-166

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-010-0109-6

关键词

HIF-1 alpha; HK-II; Gastric adenocarcinoma; Immunohistochemistry; Survival

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30672408]
  2. Guangzhou Bureau of Science and Technology [2006Z3-E0041]
  3. Sun Yat-Sen University (China)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The impact of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1 alpha and hexokinase-II (HK-II) expression on prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients has not been clearly established. We identified all patients in Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University who were diagnosed as gastric adenocarcinoma and underwent radical gastrectomy between January 1999 and December 2001. We used immunohistochemistry to determine the expressions of HIF-1 alpha protein and HK-II in the surgical sections. We identified 188 patients with gastric adenocarcinoma for the final analysis. The positive rate of HIF-1 alpha and HK-II were 110/188 (54.6%) and 40/188 (21.3%), respectively. Both HIF-1 alpha and HK-II were all positively correlated with tumor size, lower differentiation, and tumor stage. Univariate analysis showed that advanced tumor stages (P < 0.001), tumor size (P = 0.003), HIF-1 alpha expression (P < 0.001), and HK-II expression (P < 0.001) were all significantly associated with shorter survival. The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that tumor stage (P < 0.001), HIF-1 alpha expression (P < 0.001), and HK-II expression (P = 0.002) remained independent prognostic variables for survival. In addition, there was a positive correlation of HIF-1 alpha protein expression and HK-II (P = 0.022). Both HIF-1 alpha and HK-II were overexpressed in gastric adenocarcinoma. The multivariate Cox analysis revealed that both of them were independent factors on survival of gastric adenocarcinoma patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据