4.2 Review

Linezolid for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis in children: A review and recommendations

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 93-104

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.10.003

关键词

Linezolid; Tuberculosis; MDR-TB; XDR-TB; children

资金

  1. WHO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Options for the treatment of children with drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) are limited. Emerging evidence in adults from systematic reviews and a randomized trial has shown good efficacy of linezolid in difficult cases of DR-TB but with frequent serious adverse effects. Published data in children are limited and we are unaware of formal guidelines for linezolid in treatment of paediatric DR-TB, though it will likely be an important component of DR-TB treatment for a growing number of children. We performed a structured review of existing literature on the efficacy, adverse effects, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of linezolid in DR-TB, highlighting the key evidence from the adult literature and systematically evaluating published paediatric data. Our search identified 8 reports of 18 children receiving linezolid for difficult to treat DR-TB. All 18 had culture conversion and 15 of 18 had successful long-term treatment outcomes. Adverse events were reported in 9 of 18; a linezolid dose reduction was required in 5 of 18, and 2 of 18 permanently discontinued linezolid because of adverse events. We make specific recommendations for the use of linezolid in children with DR-TB, and identify priority questions for future research. For children with multidrug-resistant (MDR)-TB with additional resistance or with extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-TB, linezolid may make the difference between a successful or poor outcome, and until newer antituberculosis agents with better efficacy and safety become available in children, linezolid will be an important component of treatment for children with the worst forms of DR-TB. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据