4.2 Article

Diagnostic performance of multiplex cytokine and chemokine assay for tuberculosis

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 92, 期 6, 页码 513-520

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2012.06.005

关键词

Tuberculosis; Diagnosis; Multiplex assay

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81071318, 81071319, 81061120518]
  2. Beijing Natural Science Foundation [7092100]
  3. Ministry of Health
  4. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2008ZX10003-012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Simultaneous detection of multiple biomarkers might lead to improved diagnostic performance for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. In this study, we screened soluble biomarkers that had significant differences in patients with active tuberculosis and healthy controls and evaluated the diagnostic performance of the multiplex cytokine/chemokine assay. Overall, 178 patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis, 156 healthy individuals and 35 patients with bacterial pneumonia or lung cancer were evaluated. Among the 16 soluble biomarkers screened by the microbead-based multiplex assay, five cytokines/chemokines including IFN-gamma, IP-10, MIG, TNF-alpha and IL-2 that showed most significant differences between active pulmonary tuberculosis patients and healthy controls were selected for further analysis. When analyzed individually, both IP-10 and MIG had sensitivity and specificity comparable to IFN-gamma in detection of active TB. Combined detection of IFN-gamma, IP-10 and MIG had significantly improved sensitivity and specificity as compared with individual cytokine and chemokine detection. The responsive levels of IFN-gamma, IP-10, MIG, TNF-alpha and IL-2 were significantly lower in re-treatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients than in new tuberculosis patients. It is concluded that combined IFN-gamma, IP-10, MIG multiplex detection had better diagnostic performance for tuberculosis than the individual cytokine/chemokine assays. The re-treatment pulmonary tuberculosis patients had poor responses to ESAT-6/CFP-10 peptides stimulation. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据