4.2 Review

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype: A template for success

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 91, 期 6, 页码 510-523

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.07.005

关键词

Beijing genotype; Genetic variations; Phenotypic characteristics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The diverse clinico- and histopathological features, frequency of transmission and treatment outcome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been associated with several environmental, host and bacterial factors. Many Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes have been studied in an attempt to understand the genetic variations among the different genotypes and to clarify their contribution to phenotypic differences. Strains of the Beijing genotype have been extensively investigated due to their increased ability to spread and cause disease. Here we review the evidence of hypervirulence of the Beijing genotype as well as other Beijing-associated phenotypic characteristics such as alternate host immune modulation, clinical and pathological features, drug resistance, resistance to BCG vaccination and other epidemiological features to enhance our understanding of the contribution of pathogenic factors. From the data collected it is clear that the genetic background of Mycobacterium tuberculosis may influence the differential induction of the immune response, drug resistance patterns and clinical, epidemiological and pathogenic features which define disease progression following infection. This highlights the importance of ongoing research into the genetic mechanisms underlying the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of different Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype strains. Furthermore, these findings could help to direct future drug, vaccine and diagnostic test development towards targeting critical virulence factors and to identify persons at risk for developing active disease thereby limiting transmission and the perpetuation of the tuberculosis epidemic. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据