4.2 Article

Mapping the global use of different BCG vaccine strains

期刊

TUBERCULOSIS
卷 89, 期 4, 页码 248-251

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2009.03.002

关键词

BCG; Strain; Vaccine; Map; Immunisation

资金

  1. European Society of Paediatric Infectious Diseases
  2. University of Melbourne

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine is one of the oldest and most commonly administered vaccines worldwide. Different BCG vaccine strains exist as a result of genetic changes that occurred during repeated subculture in different countries before lyophilisation was introduced for storage of seed lots in the 1960s. Increasing evidence suggests that these genetically divergent BCG vaccine strains are associated with different protective efficacy against tuberculosis (TB), different rates of adverse events and variable susceptibility to anti-tuberculous drugs. Information on which BCG vaccine strains are used in each country worldwide has not previously been collated. This report summarises data from the EuroTB network and from WHO/UNICEF in the first map depicting the BCG vaccine strains used globally. In 83 (44%) of 188 countries, more than one BCG vaccine strain was used during the five year period. In the countries that used only one strain, BCG Denmark was used in 32, BCG Russia/Bulgaria in 30, BCG Japan in eight, BCG Connaught in two. Twelve countries used their locally-produced BCG vaccine strains. The considerable variation in BCG vaccine strains used worldwide highlights the importance of documenting the particular vaccine strain used on an individual, local and national level. This is important for the interpretation of changes in the epidemiology of adverse events after BCG immunisation, for the management of adverse events after BCG immunisation, to interpret differences in the protective efficacy of BCG, and to inform the design of trials investigating novel TB vaccines. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据