4.3 Article

Seasonal patterns of cardiovascular disease mortality of adults in Burkina Faso, West Africa

期刊

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
卷 15, 期 9, 页码 1082-1089

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02586.x

关键词

adult mortality; Burkina Faso; cardiovascular disease; demographic surveillance; hot dry season; verbal autopsy; mortalite des adultes; Burkina-Faso; maladies cardiovasculaires; surveillance demographique; saison seche et chaude; autopsie verbale; mortalidad en adultos; Burkina Faso; enfermedad cardiovascular; vigilancia demografica; estacion seca y caliente; autopsia verbal

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB 544]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

P>Objective To evaluate seasonal patterns of cardiovascular death in adults, which are possibly influenced by hot and dry climate, in a rural setting of Burkina Faso. Methods Cause of death was ascertained by verbal autopsy. Age-specific death rates (cardiovascular death and all-cause) by month of death were calculated. Seasonal trends and temperature effects were modelled with Poisson regression. Results In 11 174 adults (40+), 1238 deaths were recorded for the period 1999-2003. All-cause mortality in adults (40-64 years) and the elderly (65+ years) was 1269 per 100 000 (95% CI 1156-1382) and 7074 (95% CI 6569-7579), respectively. Cardiovascular death was the fourth most frequent cause of death in adults (40+), with a mortality of 109.9 (95% CI 76.6-143.1) for ages 40-64 and 544.9 (95% CI 404.6-685.1) for ages 65+. For all-causes, the mortality was highest in March and for cardiovascular death highest in April, the hot dry season (March-May). Mean monthly temperature was significantly related to mortality in old ages. Conclusions Cardiovascular mortality varies by season, with higher mortality rates in the hot dry season. The pattern seems to be consistent with other studies suggesting association between hot weather and cardiovascular disease. A 'heat-wave' effect appears to be observable also in areas with hot average temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据