4.3 Article

Individual, household and community factors associated with HIV test refusal in rural Malawi

期刊

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
卷 13, 期 11, 页码 1341-1350

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02148.x

关键词

voluntary counselling and testing; human immuno virus; rural sub-Saharan Africa; Malawi

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust, UK
  2. British Leprosy Relief Association (LEPRA)
  3. World Health Organization [SANTE/2004/089-735]
  4. Second Generation Surveillance on HIV/AIDS
  5. UK Department of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate individual, household and community factors associated with HIV test refusal in a counselling and testing programme offered at population level in rural Malawi. HIV counselling and testing was offered to individuals aged 18-59 at their homes. Individual variables were collected by interviews and physical examinations. Household variables were determined as part of a previous census. Multivariate models allowing for household and community clustering were used to assess associations between HIV test refusal and explanatory variables. Of 2303 eligible adults, 2129 were found and 1443 agreed to HIV testing. Test refusal was less likely by those who were never married [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.50 for men (95% CI 0.32; 0.80) and 0.44 (0.21; 0.91) for women] and by farmers [aOR 0.70 (0.52; 0.96) for men and 0.59 (0.40; 0.87) for women]. A 10% increase in cluster refusal rates increased the odds of refusal by 1.48 (1.32; 1.66) in men and 1.68 (1.32; 2.12) in women. Women counsellors increased the odds of refusal by 1.39 (1.00; 1.92) in men. Predictors of HIV test refusal in women were refusal of the husband as head of household [aOR 15.08 (9.39; 24.21)] and living close to the main road [aOR 6.07 (1.76; 20.98)]. Common reasons for refusal were fear of testing positive, previous HIV test, knowledge of HIV serostatus and the need for more time to think. Successful VCT strategies need to encourage couples counselling and should involve participation of men and communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据